Upon the shores of Lake Tahoe within New Zealand is an intriguing yet unexplained artifact known as the Kai Manawa wall. What is attractive regarding the Chi Miyagawa is that it predates academia’s rigidly attested view of the past inhabitations of the country New.

Zealand is broadly accepted to have first been inhabited within the last 800 years; however, the analysis that has been done on this impenetrable wall has shown that it is a very minimum of 2,000 years old. Additionally, it displays the tell-tale construction qualities of a lost knowledge evidently within countless other ruins found worldwide.

The controversial wall came to public attention during the early 1990s with a publication by Barry Braille first in the New Zealand listener called megalith mystery are giant stones in the Cayman ah whoa.

Forest Park’s evidence of an ancient New Zealand culture within he details how analysis has shown that the stone wall is at least two millennia old and was created by previous unknown settlers within New Zealand.

He called them the white taaha and postulated that they were subsequently exterminated by the Mallory’s who arrived only 800 years ago. Furthermore, Brailsford maintains that the wall could link New Zealand with Egypt, South America, and many other ancient civilizations continuing to list.

Twelve pieces of evidence to support his claims predictably; however, individuals within many different fields of academia have left to the defense of currently upheld paradigms the department of conservation archeologists, geologists, and just about every political party in New Zealand, including some media outlets, directed tremendous hostility.

Toward the claims leading to the site being completely shut off to the public, you have to wonder what are they so scared of people finding regardless of Brailsford evidence a conclusion that the wall is nothing but a mere natural formation has been publicly peddled ever since the publication nearly 30 years ago.

A conclusion in staunch denial of reality or evidence the conclusion made by official geologists with at the wall is an outcrop of a large ignimbrite, a natural formation created about three hundred thirty thousand years ago they claim that fractures produced the block shapes in the rock attributed to earthquakes volcanic eruptions and other natural events.

Scholars are pretty happy to date such sites but highly reluctant to attribute any intelligent design within their creation. Could the Chi Managua wall be a three hundred thirty thousand-year-old artificial wall built by the same people as many other sites found across the world? We see such possibilities as highly compelling.

Upon the shores of Lake Tahoe within New Zealand is an intriguing yet unexplained artifact known as the Kai Manawa wall. What is attractive regarding the Chi Miyagawa is that it predates academia’s rigidly attested view of the past inhabitations of the country New.

Zealand is broadly accepted to have first been inhabited within the last 800 years; however, the analysis that has been done on this impenetrable wall has shown that it is a very minimum of 2,000 years old. Additionally, it displays the tell-tale construction qualities of a lost knowledge evidently within countless other ruins found worldwide.

The controversial wall came to public attention during the early 1990s with a publication by Barry Braille first in the New Zealand listener called megalith mystery are giant stones in the Cayman ah whoa.

Forest Park’s evidence of an ancient New Zealand culture within he details how analysis has shown that the stone wall is at least two millennia old and was created by previous unknown settlers within New Zealand.

He called them the white taaha and postulated that they were subsequently exterminated by the Mallory’s who arrived only 800 years ago. Furthermore, Brailsford maintains that the wall could link New Zealand with Egypt, South America, and many other ancient civilizations continuing to list.

Twelve pieces of evidence to support his claims predictably; however, individuals within many different fields of academia have left to the defense of currently upheld paradigms the department of conservation archeologists, geologists, and just about every political party in New Zealand, including some media outlets, directed tremendous hostility.

Toward the claims leading to the site being completely shut off to the public, you have to wonder what are they so scared of people finding regardless of Brailsford evidence a conclusion that the wall is nothing but a mere natural formation has been publicly peddled ever since the publication nearly 30 years ago.

A conclusion in staunch denial of reality or evidence the conclusion made by official geologists with at the wall is an outcrop of a large ignimbrite, a natural formation created about three hundred thirty thousand years ago they claim that fractures produced the block shapes in the rock attributed to earthquakes volcanic eruptions and other natural events.

Scholars are pretty happy to date such sites but highly reluctant to attribute any intelligent design within their creation. Could the Chi Managua wall be a three hundred thirty thousand-year-old artificial wall built by the same people as many other sites found across the world? We see such possibilities as highly compelling.